Strategic Direction to the Joint Force

General Martin E. Dempsey Chairman, Joint Chiefs of Staff

The past 10 years have been some of the most challenging in our military’s history. Our service members and their families have endured every hardship and met every challenge with courage and dignity throughout.

The responsibility for defending our nation is one we have proudly carried for centuries. As we examine how the past 10 years have affected our military, the Joint Force faces three points of transition which will test our leadership and shape our future: the transition from two large land wars to a complex security environment with many challenges, the transition from abundant to constrained resources, and, as our active force shrinks in size, the transition of many service members and families into civilian life.

In October, I published my Letter to the Joint Force, which outlined four focus areas as we face the future.

These focus areas will guide us through the transitions:

  • Achieving our national objectives in our current conflicts
  • Developing a Joint Force for 2020
  • Recommitting ourselves to the Profession of Arms
  • Keeping faith with the Military Family

As a follow up, I’ve just released my Strategic Direction to the Joint Force. This document goes into greater detail of the key efforts in each of our focus areas. Read these with a critical eye and ask yourself what you can do to contribute to these efforts and make them better.

I invite you to comment here on my blog, my Facebook page or on Twitter. Share your thoughts with me on how we can improve the Strategic Direction and together address the needs of our future.

General Martin E. Dempsey Chairman
Joint Chiefs of Staff

Check out these other posts:

  • Skywalker861

    Great Pamphlet! Contents are clear and set in the right context pointing out and reflecting exactly what America needs.

    However: do NOT underestimate all modernized countries which could at some point in time due to their supperior capabilities, overtopple the US. I want to stress the technological capabilities in mostly Japan and India which are that far ahead of the rest of the world, that those regimes could exploit their superiority in striving for world dominance and entering the domain once held by the US which uptil recently has held the most excellent military force and global dominance and which could take on any adversary they come across.

    I believe this position is now contested by high tech societies which can knock out entire defense systems not only by cyber tech, but by both nano-tech as well as macro robotic and high tech weaponry which can evade and breach the whole defense apparatus of any country such as the US.

    Low tech and mediocre tech cannot beat state of the art far advanced high tech progress which is integrated in the whole highly developed societies in countries which are at the cutting edge of developing such capabilities. Not only an entire industry, but the whole structure of an entire country and its (defense and industrial) partner allies could be heading for Technological Supremacy which could topple other countries at choice.

    The US is NOT immune to such global developments. And although the US tech standards are top notch, they can be easily overrun by “Survival of the Saviest”. Tech savies / geeks are in high demand in every country.

    Science and technology is much sought after in all modern societies. Iran has great leverage in this field too: they’re not backward.

    I’m not saying that every modernized tech society is a potential adversary, I’m only warning that investments within the current budget constraints must be done with that in mind: pick and chose tech-aquisitions with great care: once bought and installed they can be upgraded, but if not matched or exceeding the tech capabilities of any potential enemy (country or organization) these investments could be all for nothing, leaving an inadequate and incompetent defense system which can easily be breached by higher tech adversaries.

    That’s my contribution to your otherwise Great and Excellent Pamphlet: it is a contribution, not meant to criticise…

  • Hcoghlan

    Gen. Dempsey, we appreciate your service and your desire to keep the faith with the tens of thousands of vets that have served also. Please keep all those sacrifices in mind as DoD recommends cuts to the “Human Programs”, such as Tricare, Retirement, VA disabilities and others. Again, thanks for trying to be as fair and balanced as possible. Hoo Ahh!

  • James Henry

    General Dempsey – I have been trying to read your Strategic Guidance to the Joint Force; however, the links appear to be broken

DoDLive on Tumblr

  • photo from Tumblr

    German soldiers of 2nd Company, 1st Battalion, 40th Mechanized Infantry Regiment pull security during an Operational Mentor Liaison Team (OMLT) training exercise at the Joint Multinational Readiness Center in Hohenfels, Germany.  OMLT XXIII and Police Operational Mentor Liaison Team VII training are designed to prepare teams for deployment to Afghanistan with the ability to train, advise, and enable the Afghan National Security Force in areas such as counter-insurgency, combat advisory, and force enabling support operations. U.S. Army photo by Spc. Ian Schell  (DVIDS)


  • photo from Tumblr

    While flying over Colorado a B-2 Stealth Bomber from Whiteman Air Force Base, MO, moves into position for a mid-air refueling via the boom of a KC-135R Stratotanker from the 128th Air Refueling Wing, Milwaukee on 09 May, 2012. The B-2 Stealth bomber and the KC-135 crews conducted the aerial refueling to maintain mission readiness standards.

    U.S. Air Force photo by Staff Sgt Jeremy M. Wilson (DVIDS)


  • photo from Tumblr

    Royal Canadian Mounted Police assigned to a Marine Security Emergency Response Team debark from the HMCS Ville de Quebec (FFH 332) to conduct boarding operations during Exercise Frontier Sentinel 2012 May 8, 2012 at sea off Sydney, Nova Scotia. Exercise Frontier Sentinel is a combined interagency exercise involving Joint Task Force Atlantic, the U.S. Coast Guard and the U.S. Navy Fleet Forces Command. The exercise is designed to continue to develop and validate the existing plans, treaties and standard operation procedures for a bilateral response to maritime homeland defense and security threats.

    (U.S. Navy photo by Mass Communication Specialist 2nd Class Ernesto Hernandez Fonte / Released) (DVIDS)